In my last brief post on the HelpGov blog nearly three months ago I forswore the mention here of Scotland’s independence referendum. Well, as will be obvious to all but the most news-averse reader ‘indyref’ as it became universally dubbed on Twitter has been and gone. I got the result I wanted (see the blog formerly known as No Thanks! but now renamed The Nation says No Thanks!) and my mind is relatively clear to return to the meat of public service issues.
Now there’s a slight cheat here because the subject of this first-post-for-three-months arises directly from said referendum I said I’d forswear.
Regardless of the result one of the features that everyone must have noticed was the high participation in the Yes and No campaigns and the high turnout: 85% of the electorate voted. There was also a burst of voter registration in the period running up to the deadline as these figures for Scotland show
- Registered electorate 2012 – 4,060,000
- Registered electorate 2014 – 4,280,000
Some of those on the new register were the 16 and 17 year olds who could vote for the first time. But many were older people who registered to vote for the first time, or at least the first time for many years.
And that’s the trigger for this post.
A number of councils have said they will use the new up to date and expanded registers to find residents who owe them money, in particular council tax and the long-gone poll tax. The charge seems to have been led by the last council I worked for, Aberdeenshire.
Instant outrage has followed.
A typical example was a local spokesperson for a group called Women for Independence, who is quoted in today’s Press and Journal as saying
The reason many people, particularly from poorer and disadvantaged backgrounds, stayed off the register was because of a suspicion that they would be targeted by councils for debts arising from the now-scrapped poll tax. Not only is this targeting the poorest but smacks of retribution for those people daring to find a voice in our democratic process.
The outrage is of course complete tosh although less polite words are available.
The facts are
- it is entirely legitimate for a council to seek to recover debts owed to it, whether for the poll tax, council tax or any other reasons
- those other reasons for debt range from business owners who disappear leaving business rates unpaid to housing tenants who do a flit owing rent
- debts owed to a council are in effect debts owed to all of us as citizens
- councils have always used as many sources of information as they efficiently can to recover debts
- people who decline to pay their debts to a council do so for many reasons. A past political act in relation to the poll tax may be one but a not insubstantial proportion are people who won’t pay rather than can’t
- poor people don’t have to pay all their debts off in one go but can come to an arrangement to pay in manageable instalments
- no evidence has been presented to say that new entrants on the electoral register in 2014 are either so poor they cannot pay their debts or are more likely to owe their council money than any other electors
- old debt is not somehow forgivable because it is old. The only criterion that should be used to write it off is an excessive cost of collection.
I am pleased councils are using every feasible means to collect unpaid debts. More power to their elbow.